Home > Chimpanzees > Conservation
•Conservation
of the common chimpanzee
Status
The common chimpanzee is registered in the Appendix I of the Washington Convention , which makes their trade
and its detention completely prohibited.
This species is classified as in danger by the IUCN (International Union for the Nature
conservation), that is to say subjected at the strong risk of extinction in natural
environment in an immediate future. The subspecies the more in danger is the one of the chimpanzee
of Nigeria-Cameroun.
State of the
populations
ø
Size
of the populations decrease in an alarming way. It is estimated that there existed
approximately 1 million chimpanzees. We currently estimates their number at
approximately 150 000, a dramatic situation. According to IUCN'S,
this species disappeared from Benign, Burkina Faso, Togo and probably extinct
in Guinea Bissau and in Rawanda
ø The number of Chimpanzee of Nigeria-Cameroun, the most threatened subspecies, is about 5 000
individuals, those of the Western subspecies, between 12 and 20 000, those of
central Africa is about 62 000 and those of Eastern around 96
000.
Threats for the chimpanzee
ø hunting for the sale of meat
and the sale of alive animals, primarily like pets. The poaching is a very
gainful employment and always very developed in spite of the actions
installation by the various governments. Even if in various areas of Africa, the
chimpanzee is regarded as taboo and not being able to be eaten, these habits
disappear and the meat consumption of chimpanzee is a current thing.
If at the time of the hunting of adults, babies can be captured alive,
that will give place to their sale, primarily like pets. Very often,
they do not leave their country of origin. Thus the "baby chimpanzee"
is a sub-product of the bush meat. But much of these babies will die
even before to be collected. And to keep a chimpanzee in captivity
quickly becomes very ificult for the animal and for the man. Often
they are kept in captivity under very bad conditions, attach, badly
nourished, even beaten. Some will be likely to arrive in a sanctuary.
But for a chimpanzee accomodated in one of those sanctuaries
divided into Africa, we can estimate that 10 other individuals will
have died.
ø the degradation of their habitat by deforestation and fragmentation. Whatever the
cause
of deforestation (for wood-material, wood energy, agriculture, mining,
even oil.), not only of the hectares of forests are destroyed but there
is also fragmentation of the remaining forest blocks. These pieces of
forest are often too small, too poor to allow a population of
chimpanzees to live durably on it. Moreover, this fragmentation leads
the various populations of chimpanzees to have less or not exchanges,
the result is a risk of consanguinity, prejudicial in the long term for
this species.
ø Ebola
: this hemorrhagic fever, due to a virus, was observed for the first
time in 1976. We primarily observe sporadic peaks of this disease in
central Africa. It is characterized by one drills mortality. It is
difficult to estimate its impact on the populations of monkeys and
great monkeys. But deforestation, bringing to the opening of tracks in
the forest, hunting, plus the displacement of potentially contaminated
corpses are as many worsening factors, because supporting the
dissemination of this disease of a population of monkeys or men with
the other.
Other diseases are also at steak, like bacterial coal.
Deforestation, degradation of the habitat, poaching, facilitated
propagation of the diseases: all these problems are related to the
development of human activities, generally undertaken in an anarchistic
and nonconsidered way. These threats apply as well for the chimpanzee
as for other species of animals: gorilla, elephant, buffalo, feline,
birds, reptiles... But let us not hide those facts, among the species
threatened here, we counts also another primate: the man!
Solutions and programs
ø
As default, the goal to reach is simple to formulate: to allow
free chimpanzees and in good health to live in a viable natural environment.
But the solutions to be set up are more difficult. But if the situation is bad,
it is possible to act, as well on the level of the states of the individuals.
The solutions to be developed can as well relate to a global solution as on
a specific problem. Each one and each action has its place.
ø
the fight against the poaching, deforestation
are thus in priority the object of the countries. The very large majority of
the nations of tropical Africa have a bearing consequent legislative framework
on the hunting or the exploitation of the forest resources, legislation often
badly applied. But the majority of the countries where chimpanzees live are
in the process of development and have limited means. Also, for necessary measurements
of police force, it is necessary to take care of the durable development of
these nations. The anti-poaching and the fight against deforestation are also
in charge of the countries known as developed, in particular while fighting
on their territory against the traffic of exotic animals or by reconsidering
their demand for wood tropical.
ø
In addition, the share of the protected surfaces increases
in central Africa. More and more, for a better action, programs of conservation
are developed on a several country scale, even on the scale of tropical Africa.
We can quote the Great Apes Survival Project (GRASP)
developed by the UNEP (Program for the Environment of the United Nations) or
the "Congo basin
Initiative ".
(We propose you to consult "the
regional action plan for the conservation of the chimpanzees and gorillas in
central Africa")
ø
But the individual can also act : on the spot,
but also in the developed countries. Each one can act on its level, for the
future of the chimpanzees but also, and by the same occasion for the future
of the man on this planet: limitation and sorting of its waste, purchases as
soon as possible of wood or products derived resulting from forests exploited
in a reasonnable way, limitation of behaviors to strong environmental impacts,
in particular limitation of the oil consumption and derived, not to buy savage
animals, in particular during its voyages in tropical countries...
Associations and NOGs are also privileged actors, at the origin of many
positive initiatives, on the spot and also out of the countries concerned. For
example, these structures are at the origin of the development of the sanctuaries
for primates in Africa, but also of the public awareness campaigns having allowed
the implication of the developed countries, principal financial backers of the
programmes of conservation of the primates.
ø sanctuaries
The purpose of these infrastructures are the
reception in their country of origin of chimpanzees and other alive primates
resulting from the poaching. Nearly a thousand of chimpanzees currently live in
sanctuaries in Africa. Emergency solution for captive individuals without
immediate future, they carry out for the majority of the multiple missions:
reception and care of primates, sensitizing, support for the local authorities
in their action against the poaching, would be this only by offering a solution
for the primates seized by the authorities.
The majority of these sanctuaries
are gathered in Africa in the same network: PASA for Side African Sanctuary Alliance, to which
belonged H.E.L.P. Congo.
It remains that the
sanctuaries are only there to answer an emergency need. However, a chimpanzee can
live more than 40 years in captivity and we estimate that we need 10
American dollars per day to maintain one of these great monkeys living in a
sanctuary. Which future for all these captive chimpanzees in sanctuary? How to
limit the flood of newcomers? As many essential
questions.
ø the
reintroduction in natural environment of chimpanzees
The reintroduction
can be seen a durable solution for the chimpanzees living in sanctuary. But
one of the essential rules of all programs of reintroduciton of animals is that
it is necessary to do everything to limit the risks for the environment but also
for the slackened individual. Also, this alternative was regarded a long time as
impossible by much, in particular because of the characteristics of the species
"chimpanzee", opinion consolidated by the last experiments. Thus, various
experiments of this type took place but without convincing result. Between
1966 and 1990, we can quote four of them:
· The first relates to 17 chimpanzees which were slackened of 1966 to 1969
on the island Rubondo (2400 ha) of Lake Victoria in Tanzania. These monkeys had
passed between 3 months and 10 years in captivity and were 4 to 12 years old .
These animals came for the majority from European zoos eager to get rid of
animals considered to be too dangerous. Unfortunately, no scientific follow-up
was undertaken and no precise census was made. In 1985, we counted a score of
individuals there, which in more than 16 years proves that mortality was very
strong.
·
In 1968, nine chimpanzees, coming from a
laboratory research medical and being 4 to 8 years old were slackened on the
island of Ipassa (65 ha) of the Ivindo river in Gabon. The observation of the
group proved that they behaved for the majority as wild chimpanzees but were all
the same dependent on a contribution of food. The follow-up lasted until 1978,
where the fall of the level of water having involved the escape of two
individuals, the others were recaptured.
· At
the beginnings of the Seventies, in the National park of Niokolo-Koba, with the
mounts Assirik (Senegal), a project of rehabilitation was undertaken by Stella
Brewer. The human ones dealt with the training of the young chimpanzees as for
the choices of food (eatable plants) and to the construction of nest. Thereafter,
the individuals becoming increasingly independent, were accustomed to freedom
until the day when wild individuals attacked them. This brought the placement
into 1979 of these same ex-captive on the Baboon islands of the Gambia
river, coming to inflate the number of individuals already high on these
islands.
·
It is into 1978 that the VILAB
(Laboratory of Virology of the New York Blood Center) undertook during
10 years slackened of 58 chimpanzees out of 3 islands of 6, 27 and 28
ha in Liberia. These animals had been used for tests of vaccination
against hepatitis. The first goal of these released was to
constitute a reproductive colony for the laboratory. Unfortunately, the
failure of the first to slacken was characterized by death by drowning
of many individuals. This death rate was brought back to 25% at the
time of the last to slacken. Thanks to the follow-up of certain
individuals carrying a transmitting collar, it was proven that these
animals nourished with wild plants and had even learned how to break
nuts with stones. However they also always needed to receive a
regular provisioning of food. In 1990, the
civil war brutally stopped this experiment and all the chimpanzees were
victims.
In these four attempts, the animals never found a complete freedom
and they were always dependent on the man.
At the beginning of 2006, the programme of
reintroduction of chimpanzees in natural environment of the H.E.L.P. Project
is still the only one in the world. Scale of this program, in particular its
scientific follow-up of the individuals given in freedom, and its positive
results led the whole of the specialists to reconsider their position: more and
more, the reintroduction in natural environment is regarded possible and as a
tool, among others, for:
- to contribute to the conservation of the chimpanzee species ,
- bring a durable solution with the problems of the
sanctuaries.
The H.E.L.P. Project
is now recognized like reference for the reintroduction of chimpanzee
by the specialists in the UICN. From today, we made references since
various projects of reintroduction are being studied, some requesting
our support by way of expertise.
But if we are the
first to defend the reintroduction of chimpanzees in natural environment, we are
also the first one to say that it is not "the" miracle solution. The sanctuaries
should not have to exist! The work upstream of the sanctuaries is thus
essential: all must be done so that the chimpanzees remain free in their
forests!
More information on our program of reintroduction, to click
here.
|